Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900KS outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9900KS is 2520 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900KS
- Performs up to 27% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Celeron G1610 - 136 vs 107 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 16 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 98% cheaper than Core i9-9900KS - $37.0 vs $1499.0
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900KS - 55 vs 127 Watts
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for $1,499 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77485 minutes ago
Buy for $37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77484 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Oct 28th, 2019
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
426
23.93258426966292%
Multi-Core
739
8.597021870637505%
Intel Core i9-9900KS | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
---|---|---|
Oct 28th, 2019 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Core i9 | Collection | Celeron |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 2 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
127 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
40.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
UHD 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
Yes | Overclockable | No |