Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9900KF is 1713 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4350.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900KF
- Performs up to 16% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Core i3-4350 - 134 vs 116 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4350 - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4350
- Up to 82% cheaper than Core i9-9900KF - $48.1 vs $270.74
- Up to 80% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Core i9-9900KF - $0.41 vs $2.02 per FPS
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900KF - 54 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-9900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
134
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.02/FPS
20%
Price, $
$270.74
17%
FPS Winner
Buy for $270.74 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 120 minutes ago
Buy for $48.1 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 119 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-9900KF | vs | Intel Core i3-4350 |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2019 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i3 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 54 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |