Key Differences
In short — Core i9-7940X outperforms the more expensive Xeon E5-2699A v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-7940X is 311 days newer than the more expensive Xeon E5-2699A v4.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7940X
- Performs up to 9% better in The Callisto Protocol than Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 114 vs 105 FPS
- Up to 81% cheaper than Xeon E5-2699A v4 - $302.0 vs $1595.95
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4
- Consumes up to 12% less energy than Intel Core i9-7940X - 145 vs 165 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-7940X - 44 vs 28 threads
The Callisto Protocol
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $302 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76022 minutes ago
Buy for $1,595.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76020 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2017
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
Single-Core
1175
85.76642335766424%
Multi-Core
9619
96.93641035977024%
Intel Core i9-7940X | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 25th, 2016 |
Core i9 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Skylake | Codename | Broadwell |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
14 | Cores | 22 |
28 | Threads | 44 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
165 W | TDP | 145 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |