Key Differences
In short — Core i9-7940X outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 2400G on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-7940X is 164 days older than the cheaper Ryzen 5 2400G.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7940X
- Performs up to 4% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Ryzen 5 2400G - 130 vs 125 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 2400G - 28 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
- Up to 55% cheaper than Core i9-7940X - $135.0 vs $300.0
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Core i9-7940X - 65 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-7940X doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Buy for $300 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 183 minutes ago
Buy for $135 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 183 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2017
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
Single-Core
1057
77.15328467153284%
Multi-Core
3294
33.19560616748967%
Intel Core i9-7940X | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 2400G |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2017 | Release Date | Feb 12th, 2018 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Skylake | Codename | Raven Ridge |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
14 | Cores | 4 |
28 | Threads | 8 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
165 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon RX Vega 11 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |