Key Differences
In short — Core i9-7920X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-7920X is 250 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7920X
- Performs up to 8% better in Overwatch 2 than Celeron G3930 - 349 vs 322 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 24 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Up to 79% cheaper than Core i9-7920X - $63.92 vs $299.0
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than Intel Core i9-7920X - 51 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-7920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for $299 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76028 minutes ago
Buy for $63.92 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76026 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2017
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
608
44.57478005865102%
Multi-Core
1043
11.459019995605361%
Intel Core i9-7920X | vs | Intel Celeron G3930 |
---|---|---|
Sep 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i9 | Collection | Celeron |
Skylake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 2 |
24 | Threads | 2 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
140 W | TDP | 51 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |