Key Differences
In short — Core i7-12700F outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-12700F is 1827 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Up to 61% cheaper than Core i7-12700F - $98.02 vs $249.99
- Up to 60% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands than Core i7-12700F - $0.52 vs $1.3 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i7-12700F - 51 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-12700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-12700F
- Performs up to 2% better in Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands than Celeron G3930 - 193 vs 189 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 20 vs 2 threads
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
189
97%
Value, $/FPS
$0.52/FPS
100%
Price, $
$98.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $98.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9935 minutes ago
Buy for $249.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9935 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3930 | vs | Intel Core i7-12700F |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
2 | Threads | 20 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |