Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms the cheaper Core i9-7900X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i9-7900X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 2018 days newer than the cheaper Core i9-7900X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7900X
- Up to 56% cheaper than Core i5-13400F - $392.83 vs $899.99
- Up to 51% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-13400F - $3.0 vs $6.08 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-13400F - 20 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 13% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i9-7900X - 148 vs 131 FPS
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
FPS
131
88%
Value, $/FPS
$3/FPS
100%
Price, $
$392.83
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $392.83 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
148
100%
Value, $/FPS
$6.08/FPS
49%
Price, $
$899.99
43%
FPS Winner
Buy for $899.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-7900X | vs | Intel Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
Jun 26th, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Skylake-E/EP | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 10 |
20 | Threads | 16 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
140 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |