Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms the cheaper Core i9-7940X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i9-7940X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 1951 days newer than the cheaper Core i9-7940X.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 6% better in The Last of Us Part I than Core i9-7940X - 143 vs 135 FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7940X
- Up to 56% cheaper than Core i5-13400F - $397.83 vs $899.99
- Up to 53% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Core i5-13400F - $2.95 vs $6.29 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-13400F - 28 vs 16 threads
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
143
100%
Value, $/FPS
$6.29/FPS
46%
Price, $
$899.99
44%
FPS Winner
Buy for $899.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14121 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2017
FPS
135
94%
Value, $/FPS
$2.95/FPS
100%
Price, $
$397.83
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $397.83 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14123 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-13400F | vs | Intel Core i9-7940X |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 14 |
16 | Threads | 28 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 165 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |