Key Differences
In short — Core i9-7900X outperforms the cheaper Core i3-8100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-8100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-7900X is 101 days older than the cheaper Core i3-8100.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7900X
- Performs up to 1% better in Death Stranding than Core i3-8100 - 226 vs 223 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-8100 - 20 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8100
- Up to 72% cheaper than Core i9-7900X - $110.0 vs $392.83
- Up to 72% better value when playing Death Stranding than Core i9-7900X - $0.49 vs $1.74 per FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Core i9-7900X - 65 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-7900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Death Stranding
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
FPS
226
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.74/FPS
28%
Price, $
$392.83
28%
FPS Winner
Buy for $392.83 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 20 minutes ago
Buy for $110 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 21 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-7900X | vs | Intel Core i3-8100 |
---|---|---|
Jun 26th, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 5th, 2017 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i3 |
Skylake-E/EP | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 4 |
20 | Threads | 4 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
140 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |