Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-8100 outperforms the more expensive FX-9590 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-8100 is 1577 days newer than the more expensive FX-9590.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8100
- Performs up to 7% better in F1 22 than FX-9590 - 272 vs 254 FPS
- Up to 63% cheaper than FX-9590 - $110.0 vs $298.02
- Up to 66% better value when playing F1 22 than FX-9590 - $0.4 vs $1.17 per FPS
- Consumes up to 70% less energy than AMD FX-9590 - 65 vs 220 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-9590 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-9590
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-8100 - 8 vs 4 threads
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
FPS
272
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.4/FPS
100%
Price, $
$110
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $110 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8 minutes ago
Buy for $298.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-8100 | vs | AMD FX-9590 |
---|---|---|
Oct 5th, 2017 | Release Date | Jun 11th, 2013 |
Core i3 | Collection | FX |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 220 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 23.5x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |