Key Differences
In short — Core i9-7900X outperforms the cheaper Core i3-7100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-7100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-7900X is 174 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-7100.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7900X
- Performs up to 1% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i3-7100 - 167 vs 165 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7100 - 20 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100
- Up to 83% cheaper than Core i9-7900X - $70.0 vs $412.83
- Up to 83% better value when playing The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i9-7900X - $0.42 vs $2.47 per FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than Intel Core i9-7900X - 51 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-7900X doesn't have integrated graphics
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
FPS
167
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.47/FPS
17%
Price, $
$412.83
16%
FPS Winner
Buy for $412.83 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7736 minutes ago
Buy for $70 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7737 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-7900X | vs | Intel Core i3-7100 |
---|---|---|
Jun 26th, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i3 |
Skylake-E/EP | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 2 |
20 | Threads | 4 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
140 W | TDP | 51 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |