Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-7100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-7100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9900K is 654 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-7100.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100
- Up to 83% cheaper than Core i9-9900K - $70.0 vs $405.0
- Up to 82% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i9-9900K - $0.55 vs $2.98 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900K - 51 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900K
- Performs up to 6% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i3-7100 - 136 vs 128 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7100 - 16 vs 4 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Buy for $70 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18388 minutes ago
Buy for $405 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18387 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-7100 | vs | Intel Core i9-9900K |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |