Key Differences
In short — Core i9-7900X outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4130 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4130 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-7900X is 1394 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4130.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7900X
- Performs up to 2% better in Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 than Core i3-4130 - 234 vs 230 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4130 - 20 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4130
- Up to 90% cheaper than Core i9-7900X - $41.0 vs $392.83
- Up to 89% better value when playing Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 than Core i9-7900X - $0.18 vs $1.68 per FPS
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Core i9-7900X - 54 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-7900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Tom Clancy’s The Division 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
FPS
234
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.68/FPS
10%
Price, $
$392.83
10%
FPS Winner
Buy for $392.83 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3 minutes ago
Buy for $41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-7900X | vs | Intel Core i3-4130 |
---|---|---|
Jun 26th, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2013 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i3 |
Skylake-E/EP | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 2 |
20 | Threads | 4 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
140 W | TDP | 54 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |