Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3900XT outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4130 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4130 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 3900XT is 2501 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4130.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4130
- Up to 90% cheaper than Ryzen 9 3900XT - $41.13 vs $399.0
- Up to 89% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Ryzen 9 3900XT - $0.25 vs $2.18 per FPS
- Consumes up to 49% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT - 54 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT
- Performs up to 12% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i3-4130 - 183 vs 164 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4130 - 24 vs 4 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
FPS
164
89%
Value, $/FPS
$0.25/FPS
100%
Price, $
$41.13
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $41.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6175 minutes ago
Buy for $399 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6174 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4130 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Haswell | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 105 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |