Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i7-4820K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-4820K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900KF is 3698 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-4820K.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900KF
- Performs up to 25% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i7-4820K - 197 vs 157 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4820K - 32 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4820K
- Up to 54% cheaper than Core i9-14900KF - $199.88 vs $434.24
- Up to 42% better value when playing The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i9-14900KF - $1.27 vs $2.2 per FPS
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
197
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.2/FPS
58%
Price, $
$434.24
46%
FPS Winner
Buy for $434.24 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 312 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
FPS
157
80%
Value, $/FPS
$1.27/FPS
100%
Price, $
$199.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $199.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 313 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-14900KF | vs | Intel Core i7-4820K |
---|---|---|
Oct 17th, 2023 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2013 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i7 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge E |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 4 |
32 | Threads | 8 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
6.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 130 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |