Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900KF outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1920X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900KF is 2259 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1920X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900KF
- Performs up to 20% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 197 vs 164 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 32 vs 24 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Up to 47% cheaper than Core i9-14900KF - $270.0 vs $511.77
- Up to 37% better value when playing The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i9-14900KF - $1.65 vs $2.6 per FPS
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
197
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.6/FPS
63%
Price, $
$511.77
52%
FPS Winner
Buy for $511.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 91 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
164
83%
Value, $/FPS
$1.65/FPS
100%
Price, $
$270
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $270 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 93 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-14900KF | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
---|---|---|
Oct 17th, 2023 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 12 |
32 | Threads | 24 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
6.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 180 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |