Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 9 7900X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 9 7900X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900F is 468 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 9 7900X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900F
- Performs up to 2% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Ryzen 9 7900X - 593 vs 579 FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7900X
- Up to 28% cheaper than Core i9-14900F - $381.66 vs $528.99
- Up to 26% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Core i9-14900F - $0.66 vs $0.89 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-14900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
593
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.89/FPS
74%
Price, $
$528.99
72%
FPS Winner
Buy for $528.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 179 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
579
97%
Value, $/FPS
$0.66/FPS
100%
Price, $
$381.66
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $381.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 180 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-14900F | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7900X |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 12 |
32 | Threads | 24 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
5.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 170 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 47.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |