Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KS outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 7 2700X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 7 2700X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900KS is 1729 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 7 2700X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KS
- Performs up to 16% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Ryzen 7 2700X - 234 vs 202 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 7 2700X - 32 vs 16 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 2700X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
- Up to 63% cheaper than Core i9-13900KS - $190.0 vs $509.99
- Up to 57% better value when playing Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i9-13900KS - $0.94 vs $2.18 per FPS
- Consumes up to 30% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KS - 105 vs 150 Watts
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
FPS
234
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.18/FPS
43%
Price, $
$509.99
37%
FPS Winner
Buy for $509.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 138 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
202
86%
Value, $/FPS
$0.94/FPS
100%
Price, $
$190
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $190 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 139 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-13900KS | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 2700X |
---|---|---|
Jan 12th, 2023 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 8 |
32 | Threads | 16 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
6.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
150 W | TDP | 105 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |