Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KS outperforms the cheaper FX-8370 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8370 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900KS is 3054 days newer than the cheaper FX-8370.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KS
- Performs up to 33% better in Battlefield 2042 than FX-8370 - 193 vs 145 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8370 - 32 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8370 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8370
- Up to 53% cheaper than Core i9-13900KS - $276.99 vs $589.99
- Up to 38% better value when playing Battlefield 2042 than Core i9-13900KS - $1.91 vs $3.06 per FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KS - 125 vs 150 Watts
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
FPS
193
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.06/FPS
62%
Price, $
$589.99
46%
FPS Winner
Buy for $589.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 213 minutes ago
Buy for $276.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 213 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-13900KS | vs | AMD FX-8370 |
---|---|---|
Jan 12th, 2023 | Release Date | Sep 2nd, 2014 |
Core i9 | Collection | FX |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 8 |
32 | Threads | 8 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
6.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
150 W | TDP | 125 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |