Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-13900KF outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-13900KF is 1506 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KF
- Performs up to 23% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX - 222 vs 181 FPS
- Up to 71% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX - $488.83 vs $1700.0
- Up to 77% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX - $2.2 vs $9.39 per FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX - 125 vs 250 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-13900KF - 64 vs 32 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
222
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.2/FPS
100%
Price, $
$488.83
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $488.83 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 48 minutes ago
Buy for $1,700 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 49 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Aug 13th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-13900KF | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Aug 13th, 2018 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 32 |
32 | Threads | 64 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
5.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 250 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |