Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-13900KF outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-13900KF is 805 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KF
- Performs up to 21% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX - 136 vs 112 FPS
- Up to 46% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX - $488.2 vs $897.22
- Up to 55% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX - $3.59 vs $8.01 per FPS
- Consumes up to 55% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX - 125 vs 280 Watts
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
136
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.59/FPS
100%
Price, $
$488.2
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $488.2 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 146 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
FPS
112
82%
Value, $/FPS
$8.01/FPS
44%
Price, $
$897.22
54%
Buy for $897.22 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 147 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-13900KF | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Jul 14th, 2020 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Castle Peak |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket WRX8 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 16 |
32 | Threads | 32 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
5.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 280 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |