Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900F outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-12900F is 1608 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900F
- Performs up to 6% better in F1 22 than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 288 vs 271 FPS
- Up to 50% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - $411.33 vs $819.3
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-12900F - 32 vs 24 threads
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for $411.33 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74181 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
271
94.09722222222221%
Value, $/FPS
Price, $
$819.3
50%
Buy for $819.3 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74183 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Single-Core
1171
46.12051988972036%
Multi-Core
7539
54.27645788336933%
Intel Core i9-12900F | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Alder Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 16 |
24 | Threads | 32 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 180 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |