Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900KF outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1820 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900KF is 2662 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900KF
- Performs up to 122% better in The Callisto Protocol than Celeron G1820 - 162 vs 73 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 16 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Up to 80% cheaper than Core i9-11900KF - $46.41 vs $232.0
- Up to 55% better value when playing The Callisto Protocol than Core i9-11900KF - $0.64 vs $1.43 per FPS
- Consumes up to 58% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900KF - 53 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-11900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
The Callisto Protocol
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $232 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12 minutes ago
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
FPS
73
45%
Value, $/FPS
$0.64/FPS
100%
Price, $
$46.41
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $46.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-11900KF | vs | Intel Celeron G1820 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Dec 1st, 2013 |
Core i9 | Collection | Celeron |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 2 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 53 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
Yes | Overclockable | No |