Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900K outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-11900K is 1314 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900K
- Performs up to 35% better in Dirt 5 than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 229 vs 170 FPS
- Up to 67% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - $270.0 vs $819.3
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 125 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-11900K - 32 vs 16 threads
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for $270 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74453 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
170
74.235807860262%
Value, $/FPS
Price, $
$819.3
32%
Buy for $819.3 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74454 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Single-Core
1171
49.388443694643605%
Multi-Core
7539
68.86189258312021%
Intel Core i9-11900K | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 16 |
16 | Threads | 32 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |