Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900K outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1950X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 1950X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900K is 1314 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1950X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900K
- Performs up to 8% better in Crysis 3 Remastered than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 195 vs 180 FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 125 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Up to 16% cheaper than Core i9-11900K - $221.76 vs $265.0
- Up to 10% better value when playing Crysis 3 Remastered than Core i9-11900K - $1.23 vs $1.36 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-11900K - 32 vs 16 threads
Crysis 3 Remastered
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for $265 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 118 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
180
92%
Value, $/FPS
$1.23/FPS
100%
Price, $
$221.76
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $221.76 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 118 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-11900K | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 16 |
16 | Threads | 32 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |