Buy on Amazon
$210
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $422
Availability
MSRP in USD: $422
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10105T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10105T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900F and the cheaper Core i3-10105T have been released at the same time.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900F
- Performs up to 11% better in Battlefield IV than Core i3-10105T - 452 vs 408 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10105T - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105T
- Up to 57% cheaper than Core i9-11900F - $89.99 vs $210.0
- Up to 52% better value when playing Battlefield IV than Core i9-11900F - $0.22 vs $0.46 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-11900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Intel® Core™ i9-11900F Desktop Processor 8 Cores up to 5.2 GHz LGA1200 (Intel® 500 Series & Select 400 Series Chipset) 65W
Buy for $210 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 151 minutes ago
Core i3-10105T
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
408
90%
Value, $/FPS
$0.22/FPS
100%
Price, $
$89.99
100%
Value Winner
Intel Core i3-10105T 4-Core 3.00 GHz Processor (6 MB Intel Smart Cache, Turbo Boost up to 3.90 GHz) - OEM Version
Buy for $89.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 151 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i9-11900F
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Core i3-10105T
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-11900F | vs | Intel Core i3-10105T |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
| Core i9 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Rocket Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
| 65 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 25.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
