Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900X outperforms the cheaper Core i7-4930K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-4930K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900X is 2239 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-4930K.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900X
- Performs up to 17% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i7-4930K - 110 vs 94 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4930K - 20 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4930K
- Up to 83% cheaper than Core i9-10900X - $98.0 vs $565.0
- Up to 80% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i9-10900X - $1.04 vs $5.14 per FPS
- Consumes up to 21% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900X - 130 vs 165 Watts
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
FPS
110
100%
Value, $/FPS
$5.14/FPS
20.233463035019458%
Price, $
$565
17%
FPS Winner
Buy for $565 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
FPS
94
85.45454545454545%
Value, $/FPS
$1.04/FPS
100%
Price, $
$98
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Single-Core
662
42.00507614213198%
Multi-Core
3336
35.59918898730125%
Intel Core i9-10900X | vs | Intel Core i7-4930K |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2013 |
Core i9 Extreme | Collection | Core i7 |
Cascade Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge E |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 6 |
20 | Threads | 12 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
165 W | TDP | 130 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |