Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900X is 1509 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900X
- Performs up to 13% better in Ready or Not than Celeron G3900 - 271 vs 239 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 20 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 93% cheaper than Core i9-10900X - $39.9 vs $565.0
- Consumes up to 69% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900X - 51 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for $565 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75938 minutes ago
Buy for $39.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75937 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
581
36.86548223350254%
Multi-Core
992
10.585849962650732%
Intel Core i9-10900X | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Core i9 Extreme | Collection | Celeron |
Cascade Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 2 |
20 | Threads | 2 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
165 W | TDP | 51 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |