Buy on Amazon
$222.99
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-10900F outperforms the more expensive Core i9-7920X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-10900F is 963 days newer than the more expensive Core i9-7920X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 4% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Core i9-7920X - 136 vs 131 FPS
- Up to 32% cheaper than Core i9-7920X - $222.99 vs $329.0
- Up to 35% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Core i9-7920X - $1.64 vs $2.51 per FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Core i9-7920X - 65 vs 140 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7920X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-10900F - 24 vs 20 threads
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Core i9-10900F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
136
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.64/FPS
100%
Price, $
$222.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i9-10900F Desktop Processor 10 Cores up to 5.2 GHz Without Processor Graphics LGA 1200 (Intel 400 Series chipset) 65W
Buy for $222.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 31 minutes ago
Core i9-7920X
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2017
FPS
131
96.32352941176471%
Value, $/FPS
$2.51/FPS
65.33864541832669%
Price, $
$329
67%
Intel Core i9-7920X X-Series Processor 12 Cores up to 4.3 GHz Turbo Unlocked LGA2066 X299 Series 140W
Buy for $329 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 32 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Core i9-10900F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Core i9-7920X
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900F | vs | Intel Core i9-7920X |
|---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 10th, 2017 |
| Core i9 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Comet Lake | Codename | Skylake |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 10 | Cores | 12 |
| 20 | Threads | 24 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 140 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 28.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
