Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 626 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 6% better in Ready or Not than Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX - 274 vs 259 FPS
- Up to 79% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX - $217.99 vs $1059.22
- Consumes up to 74% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX - 65 vs 250 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-10900F - 64 vs 20 threads
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for $217.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75433 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 13th, 2018
FPS
259
94.52554744525547%
Value, $/FPS
Price, $
$1059.22
20%
Buy for $1,059.22 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75434 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Aug 13th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Aug 13th, 2018
Single-Core
1180
70.40572792362768%
Multi-Core
7221
85.69902682174224%
Intel Core i9-10900F | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Aug 13th, 2018 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Comet Lake | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 32 |
20 | Threads | 64 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 250 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |