Buy on Amazon
$148.02
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $4938
Availability
MSRP in USD: $4938
Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2699A v4 outperforms the cheaper Core i7-980X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2699A v4 is 2415 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-980X.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-980X
- Up to 91% cheaper than Xeon E5-2699A v4 - $148.02 vs $1595.95
- Consumes up to 10% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 130 vs 145 Watts
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4
- Performs up to 4% better in Death Stranding than Core i7-980X - 222 vs 214 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-980X - 44 vs 12 threads
Death Stranding
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Intel Core i7-980X Extreme Edition Processor 3.33 GHz 12 MB Cache Socket LGA1366
Buy for $148.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77629 minutes ago
Intel Xeon Processor E5-2699A v4 22 Core 2.40GHZ 55MB 145W CM8066003197800 (OEM Tray Processor)
Buy for $1,595.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77628 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Core i7-980X
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2010
Xeon E5-2699A v4
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-980X
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2010
Single-Core
554
47.14893617021277%
Multi-Core
2604
27.07142114564924%
Intel Core i7-980X | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Oct 25th, 2016 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Gulftown | Codename | Broadwell |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 6 | Cores | 22 |
| 12 | Threads | 44 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 145 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
