Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700KF outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-9700KF is 735 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700KF
- Performs up to 7% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Celeron G3930 - 179 vs 167 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Up to 52% cheaper than Core i7-9700KF - $98.02 vs $205.0
- Up to 49% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i7-9700KF - $0.59 vs $1.15 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i7-9700KF - 51 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-9700KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for $205 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8956 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
167
93%
Value, $/FPS
$0.59/FPS
100%
Price, $
$98.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $98.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8954 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-9700KF | vs | Intel Celeron G3930 |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 51 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |