Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 3800X outperforms Core i7-940XM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 3800X is 3304 days newer than Core i7-940XM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-940XM
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 3800X - 55 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 3800X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 3800X
- Performs up to 177% better in Immortals of Aveum than Core i7-940XM - 61 vs 22 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-940XM - 16 vs 8 threads
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
61
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.84/FPS
100%
Price, $
$295
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $295 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7255 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jun 20th, 2010
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-940XM | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 3800X |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2010 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i7 Extreme | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Clarksfield | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 105 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
16.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |