Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3300X outperforms Core i7-940XM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 3300X is 3596 days newer than Core i7-940XM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-940XM
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than AMD Ryzen 3 3300X - 55 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 3 3300X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3300X
- Performs up to 6% better in Dishonored 2 than Core i7-940XM - 268 vs 254 FPS
Dishonored 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
FPS
268
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.56/FPS
100%
Price, $
$150
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $150 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8265 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Mobile • Jun 20th, 2010
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-940XM | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3300X |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2010 | Release Date | Apr 24th, 2020 |
Core i7 Extreme | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Clarksfield | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
16.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |