Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2667 v3 outperforms Core i7-920XM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2667 v3 is 1811 days newer than Core i7-920XM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-920XM
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 - 55 vs 135 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3
- Performs up to 6% better in F1 22 than Core i7-920XM - 265 vs 251 FPS
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Core i7-920XM
Mobile • Sep 23rd, 2009
Xeon E5-2667 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-920XM | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 23rd, 2009 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Core i7 Extreme | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Clarksfield | Codename | Gainestown, Haswell-E/EP, Ivy Bridge, Sandy Bridge-EP/EX |
| Intel Socket G1 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| 3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 135 W |
| 45 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 15.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
