Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900 outperforms the cheaper Core i7-880 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-880 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900 is 4602 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-880.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-880
- Up to 79% cheaper than Core i9-13900 - $112.0 vs $542.43
- Up to 74% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i9-13900 - $0.66 vs $2.51 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900
- Performs up to 28% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i7-880 - 216 vs 169 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i7-880 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-880 - 32 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-880 doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
FPS
169
78.24074074074075%
Value, $/FPS
$0.66/FPS
100%
Price, $
$112
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $112 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2489 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
216
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.51/FPS
26.29482071713148%
Price, $
$542.43
20%
FPS Winner
Buy for $542.43 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2501 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
Single-Core
520
19.15991156963891%
Multi-Core
1653
10.063314257883842%
Intel Core i7-880 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900 |
---|---|---|
May 30th, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Lynnfield | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | No |