Buy on Amazon
$112
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $749
Availability
MSRP in USD: $749
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3950X outperforms the cheaper Core i7-880 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-880 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 3950X is 3466 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-880.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-880
- Up to 77% cheaper than Ryzen 9 3950X - $112.0 vs $485.95
- Up to 73% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Ryzen 9 3950X - $0.97 vs $3.57 per FPS
- Consumes up to 10% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 3950X - 95 vs 105 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3950X
- Performs up to 17% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i7-880 - 136 vs 116 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-880 - 32 vs 8 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Core i7-880
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
FPS
116
85.29411764705883%
Value, $/FPS
$0.97/FPS
100%
Price, $
$112
100%
Value Winner
CPU Processor Intel Core i7-880 i7 880 3.067 GHz Quad-Core Eight-Thread CPU Processor LGA 1156
Buy for $112 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2473 minutes ago
Ryzen 9 3950X
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
FPS
136
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.57/FPS
27.170868347338935%
Price, $
$485.95
23%
FPS Winner
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X 16-Core, 32-Thread Unlocked Desktop Processor
Buy for $485.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2481 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Core i7-880
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
Ryzen 9 3950X
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-880
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
Single-Core
520
30.51643192488263%
Multi-Core
1653
15.454375467464473%
Intel Core i7-880 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3950X |
|---|---|---|
| May 30th, 2010 | Release Date | Nov 25th, 2019 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
| Lynnfield | Codename | Matisse |
| Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 16 |
| 8 | Threads | 32 |
| 3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 105 W |
| 45 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 23.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
