Key Differences
In short — Core i7-8700T outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1920X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-8700T is 235 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1920X.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-8700T
- Performs up to 5% better in War Thunder than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 175 vs 166 FPS
- Up to 20% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - $199.0 vs $250.0
- Consumes up to 81% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 35 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-8700T - 24 vs 12 threads
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Buy for $199 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74357 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
166
94.85714285714286%
Value, $/FPS
Price, $
$250
79%
Buy for $250 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74357 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Single-Core
1174
88.80484114977307%
Multi-Core
6976
100%
Intel Core i7-8700T | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
---|---|---|
Apr 2nd, 2018 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 12 |
12 | Threads | 24 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |