Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900 outperforms Core i7-820QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900 is 3872 days newer than Core i7-820QM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-820QM
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900 - 45 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900
- Performs up to 37% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i7-820QM - 596 vs 436 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-820QM - 20 vs 8 threads
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
596
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.46/FPS
100%
Price, $
$275.98
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $275.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1806 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Sep 23rd, 2009
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-820QM | vs | Intel Core i9-10900 |
---|---|---|
Sep 23rd, 2009 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Clarksfield | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
1.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 65 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
13.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |