Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3600X outperforms Core i7-820QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 3600X is 3574 days newer than Core i7-820QM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-820QM
- Consumes up to 53% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 3600X - 45 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 3600X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3600X
- Performs up to 7% better in ARK: Survival Evolved than Core i7-820QM - 124 vs 116 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-820QM - 12 vs 8 threads
ARK: Survival Evolved
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
124
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.69/FPS
100%
Price, $
$210
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $210 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2022 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Mobile • Sep 23rd, 2009
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-820QM | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3600X |
---|---|---|
Sep 23rd, 2009 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Clarksfield | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
1.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 95 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
13.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |