Key Differences
In short — Core i7-7820HQ outperforms Xeon E5-2667 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-7820HQ is 848 days newer than Xeon E5-2667 v3.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-7820HQ
- Performs up to 1% better in Forza Horizon 5 than Xeon E5-2667 v3 - 169 vs 167 FPS
- Consumes up to 67% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 - 45 vs 135 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Forza Horizon 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Core i7-7820HQ
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2017
Xeon E5-2667 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-7820HQ | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 |
|---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Kaby Lake | Codename | Gainestown, Haswell-E/EP, Ivy Bridge, Sandy Bridge-EP/EX |
| Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 135 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 29.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
