Buy on Amazon
$435
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $378
Availability
MSRP in USD: $378
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $524
Availability
MSRP in USD: $524
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms Core i7-7820HQ on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 2192 days newer than Core i7-7820HQ.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-7820HQ
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 20% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i7-7820HQ - 153 vs 128 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-7820HQ - 32 vs 8 threads
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i9-13900F
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
153
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.84/FPS
100%
Price, $
$435
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i9-13900F Desktop Processor 24 cores (8 P-cores + 16 E-cores) 36MB Cache, up to 5.6 GHz
Buy for $435 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 150 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-7820HQ
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2017
Core i9-13900F
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-7820HQ | vs | Intel Core i9-13900F |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Kaby Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 24 |
| 8 | Threads | 32 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
| 3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
| 45 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
