Buy on Amazon
$150
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-7700T outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1610 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-7700T is 1492 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-7700T
- Performs up to 10% better in No Man's Sky than Celeron G1610 - 171 vs 156 FPS
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Celeron G1610 - 35 vs 55 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 75% cheaper than Core i7-7700T - $37.0 vs $150.0
- Up to 73% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Core i7-7700T - $0.24 vs $0.88 per FPS
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Intel Core i7 i7-7700T Quad-core (4 Core) 2.90 GHz Processor - Socket H4 LGA-1151OEM Pack - 1 MB
Buy for $150 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 189 minutes ago
Intel Celeron G1610 2.60GHz LGA 1155 Processor BX80637G1610
Buy for $37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 188 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-7700T
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-7700T | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
|---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
| Kaby Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
| 3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
| HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Builds Using Core i7-7700T or Celeron G1610
No Man's Sky, 1920 x 1080, Ultra
44 FPS
$20.43/FPS
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
Core i7-7700T
16 GB, 1 TB SSD
Buy on Amazon
$899
In Stock
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
