Buy on Amazon
$144.34
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $799
Availability
MSRP in USD: $799
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-7700K outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1920X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-7700K is 219 days older than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1920X.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-7700K
- Performs up to 5% better in FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 253 vs 242 FPS
- Up to 42% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - $144.34 vs $250.0
- Consumes up to 49% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 91 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-7700K - 24 vs 8 threads
FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Intel Core i7-7700K Desktop Processor 4 Cores up to 4.5 GHz Unlocked LGA 1151 100/200 Series 91W
Buy for $144.34 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74262 minutes ago
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
242
95.65217391304348%
Value, $/FPS
Price, $
$250
57%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X (12-Core/24-Thread) Desktop Processor (YD192XA8AEWOF)
Buy for $250 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74262 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Core i7-7700K
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Single-Core
1174
74.72947167409293%
Multi-Core
6976
100%
Intel Core i7-7700K | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
| Kaby Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 12 |
| 8 | Threads | 24 |
4.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
91 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
42.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
