Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-6700 outperforms the more expensive Core i7-6950X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-6700 is 335 days older than the more expensive Core i7-6950X.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6950X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-6700 - 20 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700
- Performs up to 1% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i7-6950X - 185 vs 184 FPS
- Up to 74% cheaper than Core i7-6950X - $129.0 vs $499.0
- Up to 74% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i7-6950X - $0.7 vs $2.71 per FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Core i7-6950X - 65 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-6950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for $499 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7859 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 1st, 2015
FPS
185
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.7/FPS
100%
Price, $
$129
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $129 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7859 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Desktop • Jul 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-6950X | vs | Intel Core i7-6700 |
---|---|---|
May 31st, 2016 | Release Date | Jul 1st, 2015 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i7 |
Broadwell-E | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 4 |
20 | Threads | 8 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |