Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6700 outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-6700 is 771 days older than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700
- Performs up to 1% better in F1 22 than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 273 vs 271 FPS
- Up to 78% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - $135.0 vs $624.95
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-6700 - 32 vs 8 threads
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for $135 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 90 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
271
99.26739926739927%
Value, $/FPS
Price, $
$624.95
21%
Buy for $624.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 91 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jul 1st, 2015
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-6700 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X |
---|---|---|
Jul 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Skylake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
HD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |