Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2667 v3 outperforms Core i7-640M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2667 v3 is 1443 days newer than Core i7-640M.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-640M
- Consumes up to 74% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 - 35 vs 135 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3
- Performs up to 1% better in Crysis 3 Remastered than Core i7-640M - 179 vs 178 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-640M - 8 vs 4 threads
Crysis 3 Remastered
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Core i7-640M
Mobile • Sep 26th, 2010
Xeon E5-2667 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-640M | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 26th, 2010 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Arrandale | Codename | Gainestown, Haswell-E/EP, Ivy Bridge, Sandy Bridge-EP/EX |
| Intel Socket G1 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 4 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| 3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 135 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 21.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
HD Graphics (Ironlake) | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
