Buy on Amazon
$587.46
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $346
Availability
MSRP in USD: $346
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9920X outperforms Core i7-640M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9920X is 2945 days newer than Core i7-640M.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-640M
- Consumes up to 79% less energy than Intel Core i9-9920X - 35 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-9920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9920X
- Performs up to 20% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Core i7-640M - 128 vs 107 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-640M - 24 vs 4 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Core i9-9920X
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
128
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.59/FPS
100%
Price, $
$587.46
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i9-9920X X-Series Processor 12 Cores up to 4.4GHz Turbo Unlocked LGA2066 X299 Series 165W Processors (999AC6)
Buy for $587.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 29 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Core i7-640M
Mobile • Sep 26th, 2010
Core i9-9920X
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-640M | vs | Intel Core i9-9920X |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 26th, 2010 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Arrandale | Codename | Skylake |
| Intel Socket G1 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 12 |
| 4 | Threads | 24 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 165 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 21.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
HD Graphics (Ironlake) | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
