Key Differences
In short — Core i7-5930K outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1920X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-5930K is 1074 days older than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1920X.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-5930K
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 140 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Up to 51% cheaper than Core i7-5930K - $270.0 vs $549.95
- Up to 51% better value when playing Crysis 3 Remastered than Core i7-5930K - $1.5 vs $3.06 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-5930K - 24 vs 12 threads
Crysis 3 Remastered
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for $549.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
180
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.5/FPS
100%
Price, $
$270
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $270 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2014
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-5930K | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Haswell E | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 12 |
12 | Threads | 24 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 180 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |