Key Differences
In short — Core i7-5820K outperforms the cheaper Core i7-860 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-860 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-5820K is 1819 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-860.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-5820K
- Performs up to 23% better in Dead Island 2 than Core i7-860 - 144 vs 117 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-860 - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-860
- Up to 77% cheaper than Core i7-5820K - $98.95 vs $429.95
- Up to 72% better value when playing Dead Island 2 than Core i7-5820K - $0.85 vs $2.99 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i7-5820K - 95 vs 140 Watts
Dead Island 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2014
FPS
144
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.99/FPS
28.428093645484946%
Price, $
$429.95
23%
FPS Winner
Buy for $429.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
FPS
117
81.25%
Value, $/FPS
$0.85/FPS
100%
Price, $
$98.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $98.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2014
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-5820K | vs | Intel Core i7-860 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2009 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i7 |
Haswell E | Codename | Lynnfield |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |