Buy on Amazon
$199.88
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-4820K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G540 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-4820K is 728 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G540.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4820K
- Performs up to 3% better in Remnant II than Celeron G540 - 80 vs 78 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G540 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G540
- Up to 90% cheaper than Core i7-4820K - $19.25 vs $199.88
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Core i7-4820K - 65 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-4820K doesn't have integrated graphics
Remnant II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Intel Core i7 i7-4820K 3.70 GHz Processor - Socket FCLGA2011 - Quad-core (4 Core) - 10 MB Cache - 5 GT/s DMI
Buy for $199.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77843 minutes ago
Intel Celeron G540 CPU Used 2-Core 2-Thread Desktop Processor 2.5 GHz 2M 65W LGA1155
Buy for $19.25 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77843 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-4820K
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Celeron G540
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G540
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Single-Core
396
60.182370820668694%
Multi-Core
679
27.827868852459016%
Intel Core i7-4820K | vs | Intel Celeron G540 |
|---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 4th, 2011 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
| Ivy Bridge E | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
| 3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 130 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
